April 20, 2026
United Airlines CEO Scott Kirby has a vision. Unfortunately for American Airlines passengers, United shareholders, and the Trump administration, it’s a bad one.
Reuters reported earlier this month that Kirby used a February 25th White House meeting, ostensibly about the future of Dulles International Airport, to pitch President Trump on a merger between United and American Airlines. It would be the largest airline consolidation in history, combining the two biggest U.S. carriers into a single behemoth controlling roughly 40% of all U.S. aviation capacity. American’s response was swift and unambiguous: “not engaged with or interested.”
That should have been the end of it. But it’s worth asking: Why is Kirby pushing this at all?
A Deal That Was Never Going to Happen
This merger plan was dead on arrival, and Kirby knows it. A combined United-American would face an antitrust gauntlet unlike anything the industry has ever seen. Industry experts were nearly unanimous in their skepticism. The two airlines share massive route overlaps, particularly at Chicago O’Hare, where both operate major hubs. “This seems hopeless to me,” one antitrust expert told Reuters. “No amount of divestitures would fix this.”
Even if Kirby could somehow win over the Trump DOJ, he’d then face 50 state Attorneys General with independent grounds to block the deal, a wall of foreign regulators in Brussels, London, Ottawa, and Tokyo who must sign off on any deal affecting transatlantic and transpacific routes, and labor unions at both carriers who would erupt over seniority integration fights. Saying this deal can’t happen right now is like saying water is wet. American Airlines already knows it. Their rejection statement pointedly referenced “our understanding of the Administration’s philosophy toward the industry.” Even the target doesn’t think the White House wants this.
Kirby Has Bigger Fish to Fry
What makes this episode so puzzling is that United has real, pressing problems that demand its CEO’s full attention. Kirby himself warned staff in March that oil could hit $175 a barrel and stay above $100 through 2027, a fuel shock that could add $11 billion annually to United’s costs. The airline’s stock cratered 33% in a single session in March. United has been forced to cut 5% of its planned 2026 capacity, with international routes to Tel Aviv and Dubai still suspended. FAA staffing and equipment problems have hit United’s hubs hard, most visibly at Newark, where United was forced to cancel 35 roundtrip flights per day last year, but also at Dulles, SFO, and O’Hare.
On that last point: the FAA just capped flights at O’Hare, directly curbing United’s expansion there. Kirby spent years publicly predicting he’d force American out of Chicago. Instead, he got his own wings clipped. Now he’s floating a merger. The sequence tells you something.
Running an airline through that kind of environment requires every ounce of management focus. Chasing a deal with a company that doesn’t want to be acquired, and legally can’t be, is not a serious misuse of a CEO’s political capital and his board’s patience.
The Kirby Credibility Problem
Then there’s the credibility question. After being fired by American Airlines in 2016, Kirby quickly joined United.
He would go on to spend the Biden years enforcing one of corporate America’s harshest vaccine mandates, putting pronouns on employee name tags, and committing to race-based board appointments. Now he’s courting the Trump White House and appearing on MAGA podcasts?
This repositioning is nakedly transparent, and a tough place to be when you’re asking the President of the United States to back a $50 billion deal.
And if Kirby actually wanted to be a good partner to this administration, he wouldn’t be handing them a proposal that is nakedly anti-competitive, certain to drive up airfares for consumers already squeezed on costs, and politically toxic the moment it hits a Senate hearing room. He disclosed the pitch by telling people he’d already spoken to Trump about it, which put the White House in an awkward spot without their input.
If you’re on the United board right now, you should be asking hard questions.
The airline is navigating a genuinely brutal operating environment. The last thing it needs is a CEO burning political capital on a dead deal while settling old scores with his former employer.
Subscribe to Pinpoint Policy Institute